Re: Re: Some bugs?

Bill Allombert on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:55:19 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Some bugs?

To: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Subject: Re: Re: Some bugs?
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:48:27 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:55:19 +0200
In-reply-to: <678876DC21AC4208904CE6F80B1F1EA2@box1win32>
Mail-followup-to: pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to
Mailing-list: contact pari-dev-help@list.cr.yp.to; run by ezmlm
References: <200907051513.49073.jason@njkfrudils.plus.com> <9DE1D3BDB39C46D9B030CB8F3689C578@box1win32> <20090706165156.GD10525@yellowpig> <286B7FBDB3FF462C9BE86C98F80C6B5B@box1win32> <678876DC21AC4208904CE6F80B1F1EA2@box1win32>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:30:26AM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
> It's just the file language/eval.c , compiling just that with no  
> optimizations fixes the ffison and nffactor test program errors.

Could you try to narrow it down a bit ? It is possible that the problem
is actually language/eval.c not being standard-compliant and thus having
different behaviours with different compilers.

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Some bugs?
  - From: "Jason Moxham" <jason@njkfrudils.plus.com>

References:
- Re: Re: Some bugs?
  - From: "Jason Moxham" <jason@njkfrudils.plus.com>
- Re: Re: Some bugs?
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: Re: Some bugs?
  - From: "Jason Moxham" <jason@njkfrudils.plus.com>
- Re: Re: Some bugs?
  - From: "Jason Moxham" <jason@njkfrudils.plus.com>

Prev by Date: Re: patch for pari for building with msvc
Next by Date: Re: patch for pari for building with msvc
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Some bugs?
Next by thread: Re: Re: Some bugs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread