Re: Re: Some bugs?

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>]

On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:23:14PM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 09:32:14PM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:31:40PM +0100, Jason Moxham wrote:
>>>>> this fixes polred,rnf,rnfkummer  tests for Win32 MSVC
>>>>
>>>> Good!
>>>>
>>>> Bill.
>>>
>>> [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
>>>  ***   at top-level: ...Mod(1,10007)*(x^30+9557*x^29+7812*x^28+7090*x
>>>  ***                                             ^--------------------
>>>  *** _^s: degree overflow in pow_monome.
>>
>> This is very wrong: x^29 is absolutly safe. There are some corruption
>> going on.
>>
>> Does this command work ?
>> {
>> factorff(x^30 + 7812*x^28 + 7090*x^27 + 7645*x^26 + 4110*x^25 + 
>> 3307*x^24 +
>> 5763*x^23 + 7900*x^22 + 3872*x^21 + 8123*x^20 + 4076*x^19 + 3265*x^18 +
>> 3777*x^17 + 3398*x^16 + 5674*x^15 + 4018*x^14 + 6820*x^13 + 6479*x^12 +
>> 984*x^11 + 5652*x^10 + 1129*x^9 + 7573*x^8 + 1822*x^7 + 837*x^6 + 
>> 4169*x^5 +
>> 4787*x^4 + 1616*x^3 + 5185*x^2 + 2649*x + 1483, 10007, a^30 + a + 2)
>> }
>>
>> Bill.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> yes it works , or at least doesn't crash , output is

The output is correct.
So this suggest the corruption happens before the command, maybe even
in the interpretor itself.

Cheers,
Bill