Ilya Zakharevich on Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:17:22 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: group identification patch |
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:25:28PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > The point of the description system is to be able to document functions > that are not GP function, and to be able to just do install(func) > without guessing the prototype. I may be wrong, but IMO the prototype is the lest important issue here. What is important is to have the information about available algorithms implemented (prefererably with limitations described). All I ask for is a canonical location to start further investigation. Something similar to TODO file; it is not necessary to have the info in a computer-parsable way (though an example install() invocation for each guy would not hurt). How to name the file? Why not NOT-INSTALLED-algorithms? Yours, Ilya