|
Bill Allombert on Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:00:40 +0200
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: question on the height setting for qfminim on rank 2 elliptic curves
|
- To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
- Subject: Re: question on the height setting for qfminim on rank 2 elliptic curves
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:00:00 +0200
- Delivery-date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:00:40 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=math.u-bordeaux.fr; s=2022; t=1750492838; bh=atZzNdox06RdHR3hYOZSUHGvi60GJsbeS/+jokhyVpE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=u2jSnlk7KZPk+99j26crL28g1uUtbbmnr4EUJl0QiSfLFTvVQR2LaYbFGrIQPLvAb Y6WYzaPJMMZv0CVEE6Tn9TevCBX5Kk5IBQ2DCzdOEL0JU108LKXwSMYPXrctmTp6T6 PpIgFB3dfUsZRiPvbUPQYZnl/impcOVJybHpfBIJb9GnrcfHqgioJBNJV9b4gr2/2+ rNPr8iZNunp8pzPEVOq9TI6z6eAvRxTvvONGEiFYHzaTu8Xzfc/QNRxzzNiTnnLOE7 hF4muYV4A6cHCnl+VRxjmEfKIej2v8cjdqjqkGg3pbmZYFv8a7E56WNED6Ib93J1HR vy67LzUxGYx0SNgQlD7LAXVsbolw4fg/WTYClXZlx0ZM689LbvTvObku+UwXzyuZUp gyYWPd1gJtxIlWxLnkPWzLKExpz/jY0ZHtuTuuI/yGqBUcI0v/igQnZhWMrtcnsMX+ N+JE2a0EP3cqmL36X3TyPgqXTaNoEu71pVeLD3s5SaBvutSkTWmjIS+bhLkfz3y+mT zIXt9Q9dWY8YSLBP5WRpKmd2ckdjlnJWhE+n0jhutThFSYKYGagR1WiHaCGPmqXXxZ S02yHJYmGL6R8/fJl4JVbN1R+2QePQarcFNamXez13cCje5OrYSwlxfD/RcGiOn3f2 WfgHUCEaCgq1uLm7CA+UNOks=
- In-reply-to: <242f7f16-6429-41ef-8741-07948f367636@gmail.com>
- Mail-followup-to: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
- References: <242f7f16-6429-41ef-8741-07948f367636@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 09:07:07PM -0700, American Citizen wrote:
> Suppose we have the following GP-Pari script:
>
> I had to play around with the script file trying different values for ht in
> the qfminim command until the number of points were equal.
>
> How can one adjust the height value in qfminim for rank 2 elliptic curves
> (when the Mordell-Weil basis is known) such that the same number of points
> can be found irregardless of the ratio of the 2 heights of the points on the
> curve?
I have made a reply that should address this in
https://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-users-2404/msg00011.html
Cheers,
Bill