Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"

Bill Allombert on Sun, 02 Sep 2018 14:51:40 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 14:51:35 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 14:51:40 +0200
In-reply-to: <YQXPR0101MB08857C01BD3B7A10E2F7F4E8D2090@YQXPR0101MB0885.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Mail-followup-to: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
References: <YQXPR0101MB08857C01BD3B7A10E2F7F4E8D2090@YQXPR0101MB0885.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:46:22AM +0000, Jacques Gélinas wrote:
> Example of current parsing:
> 
> # primes
> Thus we could havi %1 = primes
> 
> Instead of returning the input, why not give the help string 
> (and leave the line count unchanged ?

It seems you are missing something: 'primes' is actually a value
(of type t_CLOSURE):

? primes
%1 = primes
? %1(10)
%2 = [2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29]

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"
  - From: Jacques Gélinas <jacquesg00@hotmail.com>

Next by Date: Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"
Next by thread: Re: "intrinsic <return>" could be interpreted as "?intrinsic <return>"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread