|
Josef Eschgfaeller on Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:23:56 +0200
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: pari-users <pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Subject: Set definition syntax
- From: Josef Eschgfaeller <esg@unife.it>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:23:48 +0200
- Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:23:56 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unife.it; s=google; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1nPnNO3YZBUGo50GGN47aMYbW7tzYEQMH/RnCE4MzMo=; b=L1mrOSfuBx1Ks4/1cpcWKz3awZd0sbwtygZGlfne+SYMRLGYk/e74XQOqcpv702ahx MygoaYA384BjGioU7rVIQuFQWcWUeW8HHMwPwLXqqy1AZi1EF/9Em5UbP6xiQK/EjLmK 1L+COuz/28o74zUSAm1f7E0G7n1Bp/M1rwIj4=
Could one not allow also the syntax
[x <- v | P(x)]
instead of [x | x<-v, P(x)] ?
Don't know, of course, how difficult this is.
Josef Eschgfaeller