| Jean-Luc ARNAUD on Sun, 04 Dec 2022 02:04:01 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| I don't find the solution ... |
Hi, Working with eval, I get the expected result with: eval([ a=((6*k)!*(-1)^k)/(((3*k)!*(k!)^3)*640320^(3*k)), k*a ]); But I don't achieve the same calculation with pareval. I'm using ()-> for the first equation, but what should I use for the second? I tried:pareval([ (a)->((6*k)!*(-1)^k)/(((3*k)!*(k!)^3)*640320^(3*k)), ()->k*a ]));
or:eval([ ()->a=((6*k)!*(-1)^k)/(((3*k)!*(k!)^3)*640320^(3*k)), ()->k*a ]));
The first pareval results in correct calculation of the first term, but the second term is always 0.
Thanks for your help. -- Jean-Luc Arnaud