Re: [PATCH CVS] broken proto

[Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:35:05PM -0700, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> The prototype strings were broken again.

Looking at your patch it is the valence code that are broken, not the
string, or was I mistaken ?

I think we should remove completly valence code from GP. They are not
used anymore, not documented and wrong. It seems easier to generate them
with a perl script for programs that need them. Using the description
system, it will be much easier to do.

I have such a program, but I am sure yours is much better.

So, is there any reason to keep them ?

Cheers,
Bill.