Ilya Zakharevich on Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:28:50 -0800 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: subst() |
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:57:30PM -0500, Igor Schein wrote: > Hi, > > I remember seeing a recent subst() discussion, which I wasn't paying > attention to. Now I see this behavior, which I don't like at all: > > ? p=x^2-x-1; > ? \y > simplify = 0 (off) > ? type(subst(subst(p,x^2,x),x,x^2)) > "t_INT" The behaviour of subst(p,x^2,x) and of subst(p,x,x^2) was not changed (at least should not have been changed ;-). Hope this helps, Ilya