Charles Greathouse on Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:38:27 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Failed bench linear |
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:47:41AM -0500, Charles Greathouse wrote:Always report what says \v
> My compiled gp-sta comes up with a strange answer for the lindep bench:
>
> ? lindep(Mod(1,7)*[2,-1;1,3])
> %1 = [Mod(6, 7), Mod(5, 7)]~
>
> which does not match the expected [-3, 1]~ from src/test/64/linear or my
> dynamically-compiled version of gp. Any idea what might be wrong? Any other
> information I should provide? The whole contents of the dif file:
> --- 12,18 ----
> *** ../src/test/64/linear 2013-12-10 00:28:06.000000000 -0500
> --- gp.out 2013-12-10 00:35:18.000000000 -0500
> ***************
> *** 12,18 ****
> ? charpoly(Mod(1,8191)*[1,2;3,4],z,2)
> z^2 + Mod(8186, 8191)*z + Mod(8189, 8191)
> ? lindep(Mod(1,7)*[2,-1;1,3])
> ! [-3, 1]~
> ! [Mod(6, 7), Mod(5, 7)]~
>
> I think this is my first experience with a seriously wrong bench, ratherIt is not "seriously wrong": if you look carefully, you will see that
> than just precision errors or the like.
both answer are correct.
This looks like a race condition. Did you do 'make bench -j' ?
Cheers,
Bill.