Re: binomial coefficient with negative args

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:54:47PM -0400, Max Alekseyev wrote:
> I worry that this extension is not consistent with the definition of
> binomial(n,k) as the coefficient of x^k in (1+x)^n.
> According to this definition it should be zero for k < 0.
> I'd vote for the discussed extension being made optional and turned off by
> default.

I agree that this has this change has the potential of breaking existing gp
scripts in a non-obvious way.

Cheers,
Bill.