Ruud H.G. van Tol on Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:50:20 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Maple gfun |
On 2021-12-22 14:34, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 02:21:57PM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:On 2021-12-22 14:09, Bill Allombert wrote:On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 01:48:03PM +0100, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:
Would something like Maple's gfun be useful for PARI?What does gfun ? Could you give some example ?https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/178365.178368 (not necessarily the best introduction :) )So you would like a function "serdiffdep" like seralgdep, but for linear differential equations ? This seems easy enough.
It also mentions: - - - - - -An electronic prototype “superseeker” using GFUN procedures can find about 22 percent of the generating functions for the approximately 4500 sequences contained in Sloane's book [2] automatically without error.
https://www.ams.org/notices/200308/comm-sloane.pdf mentions:Superseeker (superseeker.AT.research.att.com) carries out a more sophisticated analysis and tries hard to find an explanation for the sequence, even if it is not in the database.
- - - - - - Is that also included in what you meant? (not that I want to limit it to that :) ) -- Ruud