Jacques Gélinas on Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:57:04 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: Mysterious type t_RFRAC and denominator function |
> From version 2.10.1 on, you can use an optional second parameter to > explicitly specify the base field and not rely on fragile guesses. WOW!! This extra argument for denominator/content/numerator is exactly what I need. Up to now I had to do substitutions, relying on the priorities of variables "x" and "y". Version 2.10 was the best so far from the summary in http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-announce-18/msg00001.html (polrecip(1), derivnum(X=a,expr,{ind=1}), etc,etc), but 2.10.1 looks better still http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-announce-18/msg00005.html Thanks, Jacques Gélinas