Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?

Joerg Arndt on Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:05:40 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?
From: Joerg Arndt <arndt@jjj.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:05:35 +0100
Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:05:40 +0100

? x='x+O('x^10); concat([0], Vec(serlaplace(-sin(lambertw(-x))))) 
[0, 1, 2/1, 8, 52, 476, 5646, 82368, 1426888, 28623376]

Note the "2/1", this looks like a bug to me.

Best regards,   jj

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?
  - From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: bnfisintnorm: missing units in bnf
Next by Date: Re: Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?
Previous by thread: Re: bnfisintnorm: missing units in bnf
Next by thread: Re: Unreduced term 2/1 printed, a bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread