Bill Allombert on Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:49:57 +0200


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ( Possibly... ) Bug report.


On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:46:22PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 01:00:01PM -0400, R J Cano wrote:
> > Dear PARI-Dev team, and PARI-Users mail list members.
> > 
> > Greetings!,
> > 
> > I am humbly following the request: "bug in PARI/GP (Segmentation
> > Fault), please report."
> > 
> > Scenario: Source code compiled (including -g option!) and run with
> > GP2C (from an invocation to gp2c-run )
> > 
> A217626_vec(n,{B=10})={my(u=n!-1);my(x=numtoperm(n,0),y,z=vector(u),i);for(j=1,u,y=numtoperm(n,j)-x;z[i++]=fromdigits(vector(#x-1,k,vecsum(y[1..k]) ) ,B);x+=y);z}
> 
> Hello Remy, it is a bug in the implementation of the -g option of gp2c.
> But you can avoid the issue and improve your code by replacing
> my(x=...,i);
> by
> my(x=...,i:small=0)

I fixed this bug in GP2C rev 42a389ce.

Cheers,
Bill.