| Loïc Grenié on Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:58:24 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: Vector of args |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:43:21PM +0200, Loďc Grenié wrote:
> On 2015-10-19 at 19:11 GMT+02:00 Bill wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:10:06PM +0200, Loďc Grenié wrote:
>> > On 2015-10-17 at 23:27 GMT+02:00 Bill Allombert wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 09:11:51PM +0200, Josef Eschgfaeller wrote:
>>>>> Is there a better way to define evalf?
>>>>> Want to use f, not "f".
>>>>
>>>> Please see this report
>>>> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1639
>>>> and the GIT branch bill-call.
>>>
>
>> Wouldn't it be possible to have evalf already included in GP? It
>>> does not look too difficult to implement (although I do not understand
>>> completely the code). I volunteer if needed.
>
>>> I think you skipped the paragraph above :)
>>
>
> Sorry. I did not actually skip it, worse: I forgot it...
So, what do you think about this proposal ?