Bill Allombert on Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:13:44 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: simple parallelization |
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 10:12:41PM -0400, Max Alekseyev wrote: > Dear pari-developers, > > Would it be possible to implement an optional threading that would > automatically parallelize execution of any for*/sum*/vector/matrix > loops (i.e. all loops with predetermined number of iterations)? I mean > something like > > default( threads, 4 ); > vector( 100, i, f(i)); > \ > which would run the 'vector' loop in four threads, each with its own > value of i and computing its own f(i). > > Of course, not every loop is parallelizable this way but this feature > would be off by default (threads = 1) and the user will take > responsibility for code's correctness (independence of iterations, > order of output, or whatever other related issues) when threading is > on. Moreover, it would be possible to turn threading on and off as > needed within a single program. Such feature is available in the bill-mt git branch,see <http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/archives/pari-dev-1310/msg00001.html> You can download it directly from the PARI website: http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pari.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/heads/bill-mt;sf=tgz It provides new functions parvector and parsum. See also for some minimal information: <http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/Events/PARI2013/talks/pareval.pdf> What is missing at this stage is user feedback, so I encourage you to try it and report back. Cheers, Bill.