Re: SNF over a PID

Bill Allombert on Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:12:06 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SNF over a PID

To: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: SNF over a PID
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:11:57 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:12:06 +0100
In-reply-to: <50C6962E.6060502@math.utexas.edu>
Mail-followup-to: pari-users@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
References: <50B7B3D9.5070308@math.utexas.edu> <20121129202817.GF10148@yellowpig> <50C6962E.6060502@math.utexas.edu>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:10:54PM -0600, Alice Mark wrote:
> Thanks for your response on this.  I have a follow up question.  Is
> there a way to have the output be similar to matsnf with the flag 1?

Unfortunately, I do not think this is implemented.

One general issue with SNF over principal domains is that the standard algorithm
actually require the domain to be Euclidean.

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SNF over a PID
  - From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>

References:
- Re: SNF over a PID
  - From: Alice Mark <amark@math.utexas.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: source code - intlaplaceinv
Next by Date: Re: SNF over a PID
Previous by thread: Re: SNF over a PID
Next by thread: Re: SNF over a PID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread