Dirk Laurie on Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:33:10 +0200
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
2012/9/21 Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>:
> (We could apply transcendental functions to
> square matrices with their usual mathematical meanings instead of
> current componentwise computation, but nobody ever requested this... :-)
That is a can of worms. Even exp(A) when A is a matrix of floating-point
numbers is notorious ("Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential
of a matrix").
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: forprime
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- References:
- Re: forprime
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Henri.Cohen@math.u-bordeaux1.fr
- Re: forprime
- From: Pascal Molin <molinp@math.jussieu.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse@case.edu>
- Re: forprime
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse@case.edu>
- Re: forprime
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: forprime
- From: Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse@case.edu>
- Re: forprime
- From: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>