| Karim Belabas on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:16:31 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: Question on subst(), deferred evaluation and trap() |
* Jack Brennen [2012-02-15 19:14]:
> Using GP, I'm trying to set up a vector full of expressions on the
> variable x, and then evaluate the vector with each non-computable
> element replaced by the number 0. (Could be any value, 0 works for
> my purposes...)
>
> Basically, I'd like to do something like this:
>
> V=[trap(,0,1/(x-1)),trap(,0,1/(x-2)),trap(,0,1/(x-3))];
>
> N=3;subst(V,x,N) -> [1/2, 1, 0] ... doesn't do the right thing.
>
> However, that doesn't work because the trap() functions are
> evaluated immediately rather than stored in the vector.
>
>
> So far, the best I've come up with is:
>
> V=[1/(x-1),1/(x-2),1/(x-3)];
>
> And then instead of a simple subst() on V, I use:
>
> N=3;vector(#V,j,trap(,0,subst(V[j],x,N)))
Using 'stable' (2.5.*), you may try
N = 3;
V = [1/(x-1), 1/(x-2), 1/(x-3)];
apply(v->trap(,0,subst(v,x,N)), V);
or indirectly
SUBST(v) = trap(,0,subst(v,x,N));
apply(SUBST, V);
Test:
V = vector(10^5,i, 1/(x-3));
? N=3; apply(SUBST, V); \\ spring the trap
time = 36 ms.
? N=1; apply(SUBST, V); \\ don't spring the trap
time = 52 ms.
? subst(V,x,1); \\ direct subst
time = 28 ms.
Comparable...
Cheers,
K.B.
--
Karim Belabas, IMB (UMR 5251) Tel: (+33) (0)5 40 00 26 17
Universite Bordeaux 1 Fax: (+33) (0)5 40 00 69 50
351, cours de la Liberation http://www.math.u-bordeaux1.fr/~belabas/
F-33405 Talence (France) http://pari.math.u-bordeaux1.fr/ [PARI/GP]
`