Karim Belabas on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:50:01 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: idealappr() |
* John Cremona [2008-02-01 22:15]: > The documentation for idealappr(K,P) implies that in the case that P a > prime ideal in the number field K, the element returned will be a > uniformizer for P and integral. True. [ P.gen[2] is another "simpler" way to get a uniformizer ] > Will it always be a generator for P when P is principal (as it might > then be) No. > If the latter, would it be relatively expensive to call > bnfisprincipal() to ensure that we have a generator when it exists? It's actually impossible: the argument to idealappr is an nf and not a bnf, which would be required for bnfisprincipal (idealappr is a rather trivial function, especially if the input is a prime ideal; it is *much* simpler than bnfinit + bnfisprincipal !). One could check whether the input is in fact a bnf, then test whether P is principal, and if so compute a generator; but it would complicate a simple function for a rather limited use. What's wrong with calling directly bnfisprincipal ? [ it will actually produce a "uniformizer" for any ideal, not necessarily a prime; and bypass a useless idealappr call ] What is your specific application ? Cheers, K.B. -- Karim Belabas Tel: (+33) (0)5 40 00 26 17 Universite Bordeaux 1 Fax: (+33) (0)5 40 00 69 50 351, cours de la Liberation http://www.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~belabas/ F-33405 Talence (France) http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/ [PARI/GP] `