Karim Belabas on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:16:56 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: confluent hypergeometric function |
* David Joyner [2006-10-29 15:15]: > I have a question about hyperu(alpha,beta,x), documented in > http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/dochtml/html.stable/Transcendental_functions.html#hyperu > > Is this the same as $_1F_1(alpha,beta,x)$? No, although there is a "simple" relation between the 2, and _1F_1(a,b,z) and U(a,b,z) they are independant solutions to the same 2nd order differential equation: z f'' + (b-z) f' - af = 0 [ ' = d/dz ] See Abramowitz & Stegun, p 504. _1F_1 is Kummer's M function, and hyperu is Kummer's U. A few values explicit values are computed on p.512 (Ex 11 and 12, loc. cit.). I just checked that they are consistent with hyperu's answers. Cheers, K.B. -- Karim Belabas Tel: (+33) (0)5 40 00 26 17 Universite Bordeaux 1 Fax: (+33) (0)5 40 00 69 50 351, cours de la Liberation http://www.math.u-bordeaux.fr/~belabas/ F-33405 Talence (France) http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/ [PARI/GP]