Justin Walker on Wed, 31 Dec 2003 03:56:30 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Zeta function bug? |
On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, at 06:27 PM, Andrew John Walker wrote:
Thanks very much for the recent update, zeta() seems to be a lot faster now. I'd like to ask someone to check one value which may be producing a bad evaluation. Under pari Version 2.0.17 (beta) ? zeta(4.45+292532.0*I)%4 = 0.9628325946986762532107312785 - 0.007964269348872060270684500688*IUnder pari Version 2.2.7 (alpha) (13:13) gp > zeta(4.45+292532.0*I)%77 = -1.519052693065775291998804237 E84 + 3.820179262621090164984728018E84*I Which (if any) of these is correct?
FWIW, Mathematica and 2.0.17 are in agreement: 0.962833 - 0.00796427*I Regards, Justin -- /~\ The ASCII Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-at-Large \ / Ribbon Campaign X Help cure HTML Email / \