Brett Tangedal on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 11:05:40 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
output from bnfsunit |
I have a minor complaint about the way bnfsunit[5][2] is displayed. I've gotten answers like Mat(4) or [2, 0; 0, 2] when what I expect from the usual Pari protocol for the cyclic components of an abelian group is [4] and [2,2] respectively. I'd like to suggest that the usual Pari protocol be implemented here for the sake of uniformity and ease of use. Brett Tangedal P.S. I'm presently using Version 2.1.3