Re: Speed up RgX_mul, RgX_sqr, RgX_divrem over Z, Fp, FpXQ

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:11:27PM +0200, Peter Bruin wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 09:12:55PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >> Maybe it would be better to have functions RgX_mul_i etc.
> >> that does what RgX_mul is doing now, and change RgX_mul
> >> to do what you suggest.
> >
> > I implemented that. Furthermore I added a framework that allows
> > RgX_mul/RgX_sqr to add support for most types.
> >
> > Please check commit dcf58b3. 
> 
> This solution looks very nice to me!

If you are interested, you can try to do something similar with
RgX_divrem.

Cheers,
Bill.