Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting

Jeroen Demeyer on Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:49:00 +0100

Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:48:52 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:49:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <20170118170559.GA8613@yellowpig>
References: <587784DE.8040304@cage.ugent.be> <20170114165609.GA9691@yellowpig> <587DE700.6010106@cage.ugent.be> <20170118162800.GM30516@yellowpig> <587F9923.1000403@cage.ugent.be> <20170118170559.GA8613@yellowpig>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0

On 2017-01-18 17:05, Bill Allombert wrote:

The reason we support several plotting engines is because we wanted
to support plateforms where the available plotting engines did not
work.

Regardless of historical reasons, is there any reason *today* why you apriori do not want multiple plotting engines to be linked in gp?

Even if you think that it's not useful, I think it's better design to atleast allow it in principle.

References:
- [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: [PATCH] Implement SVG plotting
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>