Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory

Bill Allombert on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:16:38 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:16:36 +0100
Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:16:38 +0100
In-reply-to: <586E1647.20601@cage.ugent.be>
Mail-followup-to: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
References: <57E61E38.6050900@cage.ugent.be> <586E1647.20601@cage.ugent.be>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 10:47:51AM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello pari-dev,
> 
> In attachment you find an updated version of my patch, taking in account
> some comments by Bill Allombert and fixing #1881.

Applied, thanks a lot.

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
- Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

References:
- Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Minor improvents to handling of --graphic option
Previous by thread: Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
Next by thread: Re: Use PROT_NONE for unused virtual stack memory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread