Bill Allombert on Tue, 10 Jan 2017 18:11:55 +0100 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:43:10PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:47:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > I think we should remove the Qt3 version which is almost impossible to test > > (and maybe add a Qt5 version). > > Qt4 is not developed any more, and in particular does not receive any > security updates. So if this is possible without too much work, it would be > best to support only Qt5. The Qt4 version is useful as a template to write the Qt5 version, so it needs to be compilable. Cheers, Bill.