Re: latex macro

[Vincent Delecroix <vincent.delecroix@u-bordeaux.fr>]

Hello,

On 28/07/16 12:56, Karim Belabas wrote:
> * Vincent Delecroix [2016-07-28 18:20]:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While trying to integrate the last pari snapshot into Sage, we had trouble
> > building the documentation [1]. The Sage documentation (in ReST format) is
> > generated automatically from the output of "gphelp -raw" for each function
> > that is currently supported. Our problem comes from two innocent macros that
> > appeared recently in some function documentation: \Hom and \Frob. Their
> > definitions are easily find in parimacro.tex.
> >
> > The file parimacro.tex don't fit for us since it contains gp specific macros
> > and many tex that mathjax will not understand. Would it be possible to
> > isolate a small subset of typesetting macros that are needed to compile
> > function docstring? Any suggestion on an alternative way of doing this is of
> > course welcome.
>
> Use an up to date 'gphelp' from 'master', then a direct 'gphelp -raw' should
> indeed do the trick.
>
> The script gphtml (http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/dochtml/gphtml)
> uses 'gphelp -raw' + minor post-processing to generate both
>
>   http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/dochtml/html/
>
> and
>
>   http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/dochtml/ref/
>
> without error or warning.

I still got the issue with the 2.8.0-alpha. Namely

$ gphelp -raw mseval|grep Hom
<snip> @[startlword]Hom@[endlword] <snip>

And as far as I understand, @[startlword]Hom@[endlword] is intended to 
be replaced by \Hom. I am happy to introduce more rules for our 
automatic doc conversion, but I would prefer that these rules to be 
based on a pari file.

Best,
Vincent