Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation

Bill Allombert on Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:27:18 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:27:17 +0200
References: <r9wr478wmw2.fsf@host-56-227.warwick.ac.uk> <20140212132525.GB6884@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <53F267A9.1030100@cage.ugent.be>

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:52:57PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2014-02-12 14:25, Karim Belabas wrote:
> >A better fix would be for us to export nfsign().
> Let me add that having a nfpolsturm() function would also be useful.

What would this function do ?

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>

Prev by Date: Re: ispseudoprimepower()
Next by Date: Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation
Previous by thread: Re: ispseudoprimepower()
Next by thread: Re: precision of result when adding t_REAL with lots of cancellation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread