Re: QA

[Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com>]

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0400, Charles Greathouse wrote:
> I think that the quality assurance is pretty good. We're building the test
> suite up from a minimal one from years back to a really solid one, and you
> and Bill are very responsive to bug reports.
> 

I am not sure the publications quoting 
wrong/incomplete results from thue() 
agree with you.

Appears to me current QA is "da truth is
what current pari says" ;)

Speaking of thue(), would someone
bet that current testcases in 
thue/ are really correct? ;)

Another bet: in most 42 days
there will be another grave bug
in thue() in ``stable'' ;)

``solid one''??????
KB didn't quote my testcase correctly,
regressing master one more time ;)