Bill Allombert on Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:43:29 +0200


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: polresultant disagrees with sage, maxima and magma


On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 09:10:27PM +0200, Karim Belabas wrote:
> * Bill Allombert [2012-09-20 17:57]:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:05:25PM +0200, Karim Belabas wrote:
> > > It should have worked, and this was a bug in PARI. All such examples should be
> > > fixed in master HEAD after the following commit:
> > > 
> > >   commit 7079c4f7813c582949dea92a3089bf6a6c532738
> > >   Author: Karim Belabas <Karim.Belabas@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
> > >   Date:   Thu Sep 20 16:23:33 2012 +0200
> > > 
> > >       fix: resultant(x,x,y) -> 0 and related problems
> > > 
> > >       Original bug report:
> > >         p1=x2*(x3-x4);p2=x2*(x3-2*x4);polresultant(p1,p2,x1) -> 0. Should be 1
> > 
> > Should I backport it to pari 2.5.3 ?
> 
> Fine with me. It should be stable enough. :-)

Done,
Cheers,
Bill.