Bill Allombert on Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:32:51 +0100


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

comparing GP interpretor performance 

Hello PARI-dev,

I have made some comparison of the performance of GP interpretors:
Here the result with gp-2.3.5, gp-2.4.3 and gp2c (with PARI-2.4.3)

gp:                       2.3.5    2.4.3    gp2c 
Testing script contfrac... 160,     083,    024 cs.
Testing script fc...       127,     018,    015 cs.
Testing script fpisom...   182,     068,    060 cs.
Testing script invphi...  1424,     545,    269 cs.
Testing script lucas...    058,     056,    056 cs.
Testing script pollard...  372,     294,    273 cs.
Testing script rho...      027,     017,    011 cs.
Testing script squfof...  5319,    1756,    669 cs.
Testing script tan...     5164,    1340,    244 cs.
Testing script tri...      696,     325,    126 cs.
Total time:              13529,    4502,   1747 cs.

Cheers,
Bill.