Bill Allombert on Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:06:35 +0100


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Not shipping pari.desc in the tarball and other wishlist


On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:10:24AM +0100, Karim Belabas wrote:
> * Bill Allombert [2005-11-10 22:11]:
> > We should try to remove pari.desc from the tarball. This is
> > useless since pari.desc can be trivially rebuild with find and cat,
> > and is not needed for normal build.
> > (This would save 186kB and reduce the tar.gz by 44kB ).
> 
> This is quite easy, the file is added explicitly in get_MANIFEST. 

Yes, but now you need perl to build, apparently.

cd ../src/desc && perl merge_822 ../functions/*/* > def-linux-i686-14787.tmp
mv ../src/desc/def-linux-i686-14787.tmp ../src/desc/pari.desc
cd ../src/desc && perl gen_proto gp pari.desc > gp_init-linux-i686-14787.tmp &&
perl gen_help gp pari.desc >> gp_init-linux-i686-14787.tmp

I completly for got that src/desc/merge_822 was in perl, sorry...
Maybe the 44kb save is not worth the trouble...

> > Secondly, I think we could get rid of src/desc/Makefile at this stage
> > and move it to Oxx-xx/Makefile.  Handling correctly submakefile is
> > always difficult.
> 
> Done. Can you check what I did in config/Makefile.SH (look for 'funclist') ?

Ah maybe this will allow to fix the problem above bby tweaking the
dependencies.

> > Third, we should implement a top-level makefile target that take care
> > of setting up the source tree in a way such that parallel build of 
> > pari in separate Oxxx-xxx object dir are safe. Currently there is a
> > small risk of two threads updating the autogenerated .h files
> > at the same times and producing garbage.
> 
> I am not sure how to do this. As long as the generated files end up in
> the source tree (even if created elsewhere), two threads may try to 'mv'
> identical files to the same spot at the same time.

Well, we could have a target that build all the autogenerated files.
After running it, it should be safe to run parallel build since
normally they should no more modify the source tree?

Cheers,
Bill.