Bill Allombert on Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:54:14 +0200 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: polredabs(,16) bug |
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:13:12PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote: > On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Igor Schein wrote: > > ? polredabs(x^4+9670527181567158504671*x^2+4840282594390812607599424249,16); > > *** impossible concatenation in concat > > I can't reproduce this [ CHANGES-1.724, ix86 kernel, gcc-2.96 20000731 ]. > > Any special setting I should be aware of ? Strange, it seems easy to reproduce (on a2x1 for example). Here the debugging info: 659 w1 = concatsp(w1, vecextract_i(u, 2, l-1)); 660 N = *dx; 661 w2[i] = lstoi(pvaluation(N, (GEN)w1[i], &N)); 662 k = lw; 663 lw = lg(w1); (gdb) p output(w1); Invalid character ';' in expression. (gdb) p output(w1) [2, 3, 5, 1288066611066667]~ $1 = void (gdb) p output(u) [1288066611066667, 138999997, 500519] $2 = void (gdb) p output(vecextract_i(u, 2, l-1)) [138999997, 500519] No is w is a t_COL and u a t_VEC. Cheers, Bill PS: /* prototype of positive small ints */ static long pos_s[] = { evaltyp(t_INT) | _evallg(3), evalsigne(1) | evallgefint(3), 0 }; /* prototype of negative small ints */ static long neg_s[] = { evaltyp(t_INT) | _evallg(3), evalsigne(-1) | evallgefint(3), 0 }; should probably be moved to add.C or mp_indep.c