Igor Schein on Mon, 10 Mar 2003 13:40:30 -0500 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: idealprimedec() bug |
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Karim BELABAS wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Igor Schein wrote: > > 1 more: > > > > ? idealprimedec(nfinit(x^16+17*x^14+119*x^12+442*x^10+935*x^8+1122*x^6+714*x^4+204*x^2+17),4) > > *** bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report > > This one occurs in a completely different place. FpX_normalize couldn't > handle the 0 polynomial: this is actually a bug ! > > Now, the computation enters an infinite loop, ended by stack overflow. > I don't think I want to go further here: it would require installing counters > in many routines that expect prime numbers, and trigger a pseudo-primality > test whenever the counters grow suspiciously larger. > > Overkill. Please pardon my persistence :=) ? idealprimedec(nfinit(x^16-44*x^14+686*x^12-4908*x^10+17039*x^8-28164*x^6+19214*x^4-2720*x^2+25),4); *** bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report Thanks Igor