Igor Schein on Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:43:59 -0400 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: yet another rnfkummer() posting |
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Igor Schein wrote: > > This one is gone now, but here's a different one: > > > > ? bnfisnorm(bnfinit(polsubcyclo(7,3)),[[;]]); > > *** bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report > > > > Stable version doesn't segfault. > > Yet another typo. Are we done with regressions now ? I'd like to release a > snapshot ASAP. ? \p400 realprecision = 404 significant digits (400 digits displayed) ? setrand(3);rnfkummer(bnrinit(bnfinit(quadpoly(2540,y),1),9,1),[3,1;0,1]); *** precision too low in isunit. Before it was working fine at default precision. Thanks Igor