Igor Schein on Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:43:59 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: yet another rnfkummer() posting


On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Igor Schein wrote:
> > This one is gone now, but here's a different one:
> >
> > ? bnfisnorm(bnfinit(polsubcyclo(7,3)),[[;]]);
> >   ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report
> >
> > Stable version doesn't segfault.
> 
> Yet another typo. Are we done with regressions now ? I'd like to release a
> snapshot ASAP.

? \p400
   realprecision = 404 significant digits (400 digits displayed)
? setrand(3);rnfkummer(bnrinit(bnfinit(quadpoly(2540,y),1),9,1),[3,1;0,1]);
  ***   precision too low in isunit.

Before it was working fine at default precision.

Thanks

Igor