Igor Schein on Thu, 5 Sep 2002 10:47:07 -0400


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: yet another rnfkummer() posting


On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:41:41PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Igor Schein wrote:
> > This one is gone now, but here's a different one:
> >
> > ? bnfisnorm(bnfinit(polsubcyclo(7,3)),[[;]]);
> >   ***   bug in GP (Segmentation Fault), please report
> >
> > Stable version doesn't segfault.
> 
> Yet another typo. Are we done with regressions now ? I'd like to release a
> snapshot ASAP.

far from done.

? setrand(1);rnfkummer(bnrinit(bnfinit(y^6-19*y^5-11*y^4-6*y^3-15*y^2-11*y+15,1),4,1),[2,1,1;0,1,0;0,0,1]);
  ***   the PARI stack overflows !
  current stack size: 8000000 (7.629 Mbytes)
  [hint] you can increase GP stack with allocatemem()

Before, would finish at 4MB stack.

? bezoutres(Pol(sin(x)+Pi),Pol(cos(x)));
  ***   bug in subresext, please report

? setrand(2);rnfkummer(bnrinit(bnfinit(quadpoly(-6580,y)),9,1),matdiagonal([3,1,1,1]));
  ***   not an Abelian extension in rnfnormgroup.

Still there.

Also, I have compilation problem on FreeBSD, wrong timing reporting in
galoisinit(), 1 round4 bug and 1 bnrstark() bug - Xavier is aware of
the last 2.

Thanks

Igor