Re: GP algdep() bug?

[Michael Somos <somos@grail.cba.csuohio.edu>]

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Karim BELABAS wrote:

> >
> > Could something have changed in the last few weeks for 'algdep()'?
> 
> The current CVS version uses PSLQ instead of LLL / HJLS to find integral
> relations [ undocumented for now, the code is in a _very_ unstable state ].
> 
> The output means that PSLQ failed and any relation (in algdep context: a
> minimal polynomial) has height > 20837... I believe the current output is
> more useful than the former one.
> 
Perhaps there is a difference of opinion here? Would it be possible to
have the option of using the old behavior? It would be very useful.
Shalom, Michael