On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:23:24AM -0400, Charles Greathouse wrote:No, this just means I like to see your gprc.txt!
> It looks like it does work if I increase the stack. With binary splitting I
> determined that it fails with 24,183,000 bytes but succeeds with 24,184,000
> bytes. That's a lot of memory for this calculation, but admittedly a pretty
> small amount in total.
>
> I turned on \gm4 and gp entered an infinite out of memory loop (Ctrl+C
> killed the process).
>
> I was not able to reproduce the results with -f, even at the minimum stack
> size of 500,032. Maybe this means this is a non-issue?
Cheers
Bill.