? setrand(756);while(1,gettime;rnfkummer(bnrinit(bnfinit(quadpoly(13829,y)),211,1),[5,1;0,1]);print(gettime))
5516
6340
5873
5493
5432
5617
5588
15386
5652
5617
5429
5516
5465
5712
5685
5328
^C *** at top-level: ...and(756);while(1,gettime;rnfkummer(bnrinit(bn
*** ^--------------------
*** rnfkummer: user interrupt after 1min, 40,690 ms.
Nothing catastrophic by any means, but I was curious if there's a reason for the 8th iteration to be almost 3 times slower than the average - maybe there's a room for improvement somewhere.
I prepared this example a while ago waiting to report it in case bug 910 patches wouldn't fix the stack problem. They did, but I didn't want to waste this example and decided to reuse it here.