? \p1000
realprecision = 1001 significant digits (1000 digits displayed)
? matfrobenius([1,0,0,1,0,1;1,1,0,1,1,0;0,1,1,0,0,1;1,0,1,1,1,0;1,1,1,1,1,1;0,0,1,0,0,0]*1.);
*** matfrobenius: Warning: inexact computation in RgX_extgcd.
*** matfrobenius: Warning: inexact computation in RgX_extgcd.
*** at top-level: matfrobenius([1,0,0,
*** ^--------------------
*** matfrobenius: precision too low in matfrobenius.
matfrobenius() issues have been discussed in bug reports 167 and 925, I am not sure whether I can expect the above to work given the current implementation and constrains.