Justin C. Walker on Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:53:53 -0800

 Re: .ltx vs. .tex (was INSTALL.tex)


On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 12:09 PM, Leonhard Möhring wrote:


At 10:22 26.11.2002 -0800, you wrote:


[snip]

This is a TeX file, not a LaTeX file.

You must use tex INSTALL.tex. If you latex I get the same warning as you.


There is a .ltx extension, while almost never used, would allow to distinguish between
LaTeX and TeX files.



That would help, but as you say, noone uses it. I need to learn how to distinguish them for myself, clearly.

Regards,

Justin



As a fairly sound guess, if it starts with \documentclass[..]{....}
(or \documentstyle[..]{..} for old LaTeX), and maybe \usepackage{...}
and has a lot of \begin{...} .... \end{..} clauses, you can be
quite sure it's LaTeX.

But even if you decided it to be LaTeX, you need to check if it 2.09
or 2\epsilon and if you decided it's not LaTeX you can't be sure it's
plain, since there are quite a lot of other macro packages going
around (AMS-TeX springs to my mind).

So even if ppl would use .ltx and .tex you still wouldn't be sure how
to treat those files without having a look at them (or checking some
readme which lies in the vicinity). I doubt that the usage of .ltx would
help the TeX community much, but that's just my two cents.



It's getting so that writing good documentation is as much troubXXXXXfun as programming. Whatever happened to WYSIWYG? :-}.

Regards,

Justin

--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large  *
Institute for General Semantics        |    Men are from Earth.
|    Women are from Earth.
|       Deal with it.
*--------------------------------------*-------------------------------*