Re: parsum and nbthreads

[Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:47:11PM +0200, Loïc Grenié wrote:
>     I've pushed a "loic-parsum" to pari git. It does not change the number
> of
>   threads (I still think it's not optimal right now), however it addresses
> most
>   of the problems I've illustrated before, should not hurt performance, as
> far
>   as I can tell, and passes the tests involving parsum (export, parallel,
>   programming).
> 
>     The drawback is that it exports one more function (+1 line in paripriv,
> and
>   +7 non-empty lines in src/functions/programming/parsum) and substitutes
>   two functions by a longer one (+14 non-empty lines in
> src/language/eval.c).
> 
>        Could you consider it for inclusion, eventually modified?

Sure. Do you have some tests where it makes a difference ?

Cheers,
Bill.