Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask

Andreas Enge on Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:43:19 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask

To: pari-dev@pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
From: Andreas Enge <andreas.enge@inria.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:43:10 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:43:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <20170110124706.GD18728@yellowpig>
References: <5874B7BF.8040109@cage.ugent.be> <20170110124706.GD18728@yellowpig>
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:47:06PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I think we should remove the Qt3 version which is almost impossible to test
> (and maybe add a Qt5 version).

Qt4 is not developed any more, and in particular does not receive any
security updates. So if this is possible without too much work, it would be
best to support only Qt5.

Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

References:
- [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
  - From: Jeroen Demeyer <jdemeyer@cage.ugent.be>
- Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Qt4 is a valid graphic option for --ask
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread