|Alain SMEJKAL on Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:18:18 +0100|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: looking for UltraSparc3i binary|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Schein" <email@example.com>
To: "Alain SMEJKAL" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: looking for UltraSparc3i binary
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:59:34PM +0100, Alain SMEJKAL wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Igor Schein" <email@example.com>
> > To: "Alain SMEJKAL" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 11:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: looking for UltraSparc3i binary
> > > Is UltraSparc3i a requirement? How about ultra3cu?
> > Ultra3cu will be nice too, I suppose it will not induce significant changes
> > and binary should be compatible. 64-bit mode is more essential for that
> > test.
> See attached. readline is disabled, which shouldn't matter for
> testing purposes anyway.
Thanks so much for your prompt help!