|Alexander Shumakovitch on Thu, 29 May 2003 22:50:19 +0200|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: matsnf segfaults|
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 08:53:31PM +0200, Karim BELABAS wrote: > Fixed in CVS (bundled with extensive cleanup), and backported (minimal > patch) to the stable branch. Thanks a lot! > P.S: Note that the algorithm used is spectacularly inefficient in medium to > large dimensions (it was written to be used for 10 x 10 matrices...), so I > doubt the computation will ever finish. That's weird! In fact, this matrix was produced by mathnf to speed up the calculations. It was always the case for me that matsnf performs faster on matrices prepared by mathnf first. Now in this case, it takes less than a second to get the SNF of the original matrix directly. But way too much after HNF (it complained about low memory after a couple of minutes). Is it expected? Thanks again, --- Alexander.