|Bill Allombert on Mon, 7 Apr 2003 12:17:26 +0200|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [PATCH CVS] broken proto|
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:35:05PM -0700, Ilya Zakharevich wrote: > The prototype strings were broken again. Looking at your patch it is the valence code that are broken, not the string, or was I mistaken ? I think we should remove completly valence code from GP. They are not used anymore, not documented and wrong. It seems easier to generate them with a perl script for programs that need them. Using the description system, it will be much easier to do. I have such a program, but I am sure yours is much better. So, is there any reason to keep them ? Cheers, Bill.