Re: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?

Bill Allombert on Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:07:31 +0100

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?

To: Developers Pari <pari-dev@list.cr.yp.to>
Subject: Re: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
From: Bill Allombert <allomber@math.u-bordeaux.fr>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:07:31 +0100
In-reply-to: <20021101081316.GA3668@math.berkeley.edu>; from ilya@math.berkeley.edu on Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:13:16AM -0800
References: <20021101081316.GA3668@math.berkeley.edu>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:13:16AM -0800, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> On which architectures can PARI run with sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
> I tested, and it does not work on x86.

None, as far as I know.
None of the 11 architectures I have access to exhibit this behaviour.

Cheers,
Bill.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
  - From: Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@Math.Berkeley.EDU>

References:
- sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
  - From: Ilya Zakharevich <ilya@Math.Berkeley.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: bug in pari-gp precision?
Next by Date: Re: bug in pari-gp precision?
Previous by thread: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
Next by thread: Re: sizeof(long) > sizeof(long*)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread