Michael Somos on Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:51:54 -0400 (EDT)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GP algdep() bug?

On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Karim BELABAS wrote:

> >
> > Could something have changed in the last few weeks for 'algdep()'?
> The current CVS version uses PSLQ instead of LLL / HJLS to find integral
> relations [ undocumented for now, the code is in a _very_ unstable state ].
> The output means that PSLQ failed and any relation (in algdep context: a
> minimal polynomial) has height > 20837... I believe the current output is
> more useful than the former one.
Perhaps there is a difference of opinion here? Would it be possible to
have the option of using the old behavior? It would be very useful.
Shalom, Michael